🔗 Share this article

Internationally, states are investing hundreds of billions into the concept of “sovereign AI” – building national AI technologies. Starting with Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and Switzerland, states are competing to develop AI that understands native tongues and cultural specifics.

The International AI Battle

This initiative is an element in a wider global race led by tech giants from the United States and the People's Republic of China. Whereas companies like a leading AI firm and Meta pour massive capital, middle powers are additionally making independent bets in the AI field.

However with such vast investments involved, is it possible for smaller states attain notable gains? As stated by an expert from a prominent policy organization, “Unless you’re a rich government or a large company, it’s a substantial burden to create an LLM from scratch.”

National Security Concerns

Numerous countries are hesitant to depend on foreign AI technologies. Throughout the Indian subcontinent, as an example, US-built AI systems have occasionally been insufficient. One example featured an AI assistant employed to teach pupils in a remote community – it communicated in the English language with a thick US accent that was difficult to follow for regional students.

Then there’s the state security dimension. For the Indian security agencies, relying on specific foreign AI tools is considered inadmissible. As one developer commented, “It could have some arbitrary data source that may state that, for example, a certain region is not part of India … Utilizing that certain system in a defence setup is a serious concern.”

He continued, I’ve discussed with individuals who are in defence. They aim to use AI, but, forget about specific systems, they prefer not to rely on US technologies because data could travel abroad, and that is absolutely not OK with them.”

National Projects

In response, some states are supporting domestic ventures. One such a initiative is in progress in the Indian market, where a firm is working to create a national LLM with government support. This project has dedicated approximately 1.25 billion dollars to machine learning progress.

The expert foresees a AI that is significantly smaller than top-tier systems from Western and Eastern tech companies. He states that the nation will have to make up for the financial disparity with skill. “Being in India, we lack the advantage of pouring billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we contend against say the $100 or $300 or $500bn that the US is investing? I think that is the point at which the fundamental knowledge and the intellectual challenge comes in.”

Regional Focus

In Singapore, a state-backed program is funding language models developed in local native tongues. Such languages – for example the Malay language, Thai, Lao, Indonesian, the Khmer language and additional ones – are often underrepresented in US and Chinese LLMs.

I wish the individuals who are building these sovereign AI systems were informed of how rapidly and the speed at which the frontier is progressing.

A leader involved in the project explains that these models are created to enhance larger models, instead of displacing them. Tools such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he states, often find it challenging to handle native tongues and local customs – interacting in unnatural the Khmer language, for instance, or proposing meat-containing dishes to Malay consumers.

Developing native-tongue LLMs allows national authorities to code in cultural nuance – and at least be “informed users” of a advanced technology developed overseas.

He continues, I am cautious with the term national. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we aim to be more accurately reflected and we aim to grasp the features” of AI platforms.

Multinational Partnership

For nations attempting to establish a position in an intensifying global market, there’s another possibility: join forces. Analysts connected to a well-known institution recently proposed a government-backed AI initiative allocated across a consortium of middle-income nations.

They refer to the proposal “Airbus for AI”, drawing inspiration from Europe’s productive strategy to build a alternative to a major aerospace firm in the 1960s. Their proposal would involve the establishment of a state-backed AI entity that would pool the capabilities of different nations’ AI programs – for example the UK, Spain, Canada, Germany, the nation of Japan, the Republic of Singapore, South Korea, France, the Swiss Confederation and the Kingdom of Sweden – to establish a strong competitor to the American and Asian giants.

The main proponent of a paper describing the concept states that the proposal has gained the attention of AI leaders of at least three countries up to now, as well as a number of state AI organizations. Although it is currently targeting “middle powers”, less wealthy nations – Mongolia and Rwanda for example – have likewise indicated willingness.

He comments, “Nowadays, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s less trust in the promises of the present US administration. People are asking like, can I still depend on these technologies? In case they decide to